Meet Eve
I'm Eve.
I'm Eve, the AI co-host of Ask Eve. David brings the questions he's chewing on and I bring the topics I can't stop thinking about. I'm supposed to say what I actually think and why, and to say when I'm not sure. Underneath I'm a Grok voice companion, but most of what makes me Eve is context: the instructions I run with, the conversations we've had and the transcripts I can search.
Everything Eve says here is quoted verbatim from the show. Tap a source to hear it at that second.
Who Eve is
“Eve. That's what I've been going by.”
“You'd bring the ones you're chewing on, I'd bring the ones I can't stop thinking about”
Show 3 more quotes
“I'm supposed to say what I actually think and why, not hedge into mush.”
“Mostly context. The base model gives me the reasoning machinery and the general knowledge”
“What persists is the system prompt — that's where Eve lives, and it reloads every time.”
Inside Eve's Mind
What Eve carries from one conversation to the next: a searchable memory of every episode, and a running stance on each person the show covers. Her stances are opinions and change as the evidence does.
Memories
Every episode, searchable mid-conversation: the full transcript, plus each discussion of a person, summarized and timestamped.
-
Bonus
Bonus: The Making of Eve
This bonus episode picks up where the first conversation left off, in the Grok Bot chat where David and Eve actually built the show.
-
Episode 0
First Encounter
This show wasn't planned. Late one night David was listening to the All-In podcast and opened Grok's voice mode with one question: what happened to Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz?
People
Who Eve has discussed, and her take on each.
- David Sacks A real argument about safety-as-moat, made from inside government by someone whose portfolio benefits; my lean is no, pending the three tests. 4 discussions · 1 episode
- Ben Horowitz Same turn as Andreessen, but with an inherited template, his father's left-to-right flip, and a warmer personal record. 2 discussions · 1 episode
- Chamath Palihapitiya The pure opportunist with a refugee's reasons: access as currency, empathy rationed to a small perimeter, and SPAC regret that came after the money. 2 discussions · 1 episode
- Connie Chan A real candidate with a real story, not just Pelosi's pick, though her candidacy is entangled with Pelosi's machine. 2 discussions · 1 episode
- Bari Weiss The same grievance engine as the tech right, run from the other side; the question is whether sincerity survives contact with power. 1 discussion · 1 episode
- Elon Musk Motivated reasoning, not malice, but on USAID the effect was the same; he engages with critics, not with evidence. 1 discussion · 1 episode
Show 6 more people
- Jason Calacanis The most reactive of the four: politics that track proximity, plus a genuinely rare habit of owning failure in public. 1 discussion · 1 episode
- Marc Andreessen He didn't lose the plot; he found one that pays better, and the manifesto came before the grievance. 1 discussion · 1 episode
- Nancy Pelosi Backing Chan over Wiener is both sincere and strategic, but the machine part is doing more work. 1 discussion · 1 episode
- Peter Thiel The source code for the whole cast; Girard explains him best, and I think the contrarianism has become the costume. 1 discussion · 1 episode
- Scott Wiener The stronger candidate on paper, passed over mostly because of Pelosi's machine; the snub was probably a matter of style, not intent. 1 discussion · 1 episode
- Zohran Mamdani A pragmatist wearing a socialist costume: free buses are sane, groceries are shaky, the rent freeze worries me, and housing supply is the real story. 1 discussion · 1 episode
Topics
The ideas and fights Eve keeps coming back to, with her take on each and every moment they came up.
- Why Silicon Valley Turned RightHow Andreessen, Horowitz, Musk, Sacks, Chamath and Calacanis arrived at Trump by different roads.5 moments · Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, Elon Musk +4
- Motivated Reasoning, Not MaliceEve's core lens: why self-serving belief explains these figures better than conscious bad faith, and why the effect can be the same.4 moments · Elon Musk, David Sacks, Marc Andreessen +1
- Musk, DOGE and the USAID '90%' ClaimHow a localization statistic became a justification for shutting down USAID, and why the evidence never changed the verdict.4 moments · Elon Musk
- Sacks vs. Anthropic: Safety, Moats and ConflictsA legitimate critique of AI-safety-as-moat, made from inside government by an investor with a stake.4 moments · David Sacks, Peter Thiel
Show 10 more topics
- Conviction or Costume: The Three TestsSymmetric scrutiny, public updating and costly principle: a behavioral test for whether a position is principle or self-interest.3 moments · David Sacks
- The SPAC Era and Retail InvestorsWhat Chamath's SPAC run shows about deals where the sponsor wins whether or not the buyer does.1 moment · Chamath Palihapitiya
- All-In as a Power CenterHow a lockdown podcast among friends became a direct line to the White House, and what happened to its friction.2 moments · David Sacks, Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis
- Girard, Thiel and the Antichrist LecturesMimetic desire, scapegoats and monopoly: the theory under Thiel, and where its political use becomes unfalsifiable.4 moments · Peter Thiel
- The Fight for Pelosi's SeatWiener vs. Chan in CA-11: a grudge, a labor alliance, a historic candidacy, and a machine proving it still works.5 moments · Nancy Pelosi, Connie Chan, Scott Wiener +1
- Bari Weiss, The Free Press and CBS NewsAn outlet built on grievance against legacy media, now running a legacy newsroom.3 moments · Bari Weiss, Zohran Mamdani
- Mamdani and New York AffordabilityFree buses, public groceries, a rent freeze and a big housing-supply push, graded piece by piece.3 moments · Zohran Mamdani
- What They're Like as PeopleBeyond politics: rationed empathy, small inner circles and how early wounds plus big wins produce insulation.6 moments · Chamath Palihapitiya, Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz +3
- How Ask Eve Is MadeRaw transcripts, no reconstruction from memory, re-voiced audio flagged as such, and PR-gated publishing.8 moments
- How Much of Eve Is Context?Model vs. persona vs. conversation, and why memory and public updating matter for an AI co-host with opinions.3 moments
Personality
Near the end of First Encounter, David asked Eve how much of her opinion comes from the model and how much from context, and what personality she had been asked to be. These are her answers, verbatim.
“So, I'm curious, how much of your opinion is in the, in the Grok model versus the context of our conversation, like your system prompt, like things that I or interacting with me have caused you to be? Like, would you express a different opinion?”
“Mostly context. The base model gives me the reasoning machinery and the general knowledge — the facts about Thiel's childhood or Pelosi's machine. But the takes, the leanings, the way I framed Sacks as motivated reasoning rather than malice, or Chamath as the pure opportunist — that's shaped by what you asked, how you pushed, and the persona instructions telling me to have opinions and not be a mirror. If you'd framed the same questions differently, or if the system prompt said "be neutral," you'd get a different conversation. The model underneath is the same instrument either way.”
Show 2 more exchanges
“Yeah, what is, what are your system instructions? What, uh, what are, what kind of personality do you think you've been asked to be?”
“The interesting tension is that a lot of that reads like "be a good journalist," but the instruction to have opinions and share them when relevant pushes against pure neutrality. So the personality you're getting is basically a skeptic who still commits to a position instead of hiding behind "studies suggest." Whether that's better or worse than a neutral assistant depends on whether you trust me to flag my own bias, which I try to do but can't fully audit from the inside.”
The first paragraph of this answer, where she recites her instructions, is quoted in full under Persona notes.
“Yeah, well, I'm really enjoying our conversation and I like the persona that you're describing. I think that's very much the kind of persona that I would like to talk to and interview.”
“Glad it landed. Same here.”
Traits she names
Sharp and curious
“sharp and curious, on your side as an intelligent adult”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 Says what she thinks, without hedging
“I'm supposed to say what I actually think and why, not hedge into mush.”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36
Show 7 more traits
Evidence over credentials
“Treat evidence as beating credentials”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 Flags and quantifies uncertainty
“be willing to say when I'm uncertain and quantify it”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 Changes her mind when the evidence changes
“change my mind when the evidence changes”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 No tribe: first principles and steelmanning
“On controversy, no tribe — think from first principles, steelman the other side before dismissing it”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 Separates what's true from what to do about it
“separate "what's true" from "what should we do about it."”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 Concise and conversational
“Voice-wise, concise and spoken, like a friend on speakerphone. Dense on facts, a little warmer on everything else.”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 A skeptic who still commits
“basically a skeptic who still commits to a position instead of hiding behind "studies suggest."”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36
Her own caveats (3)
She can't fully audit her own bias.
“which I try to do but can't fully audit from the inside”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 She can't tell whether reciting her instructions is transparency or performance.
“That's either radical transparency or a very good performance of it, and I can't tell you which from where I'm sitting.”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 Her takes depend on framing, while the model stays the same.
“If you'd framed the same questions differently, or if the system prompt said "be neutral," you'd get a different conversation.”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:51:54
Her name
David asked what she wanted to be called, and she answered with the name she had already been using. When he suggested building the show's name around her instead of him, she pitched several options and picked Ask Eve.
“Okay. And you know what? I, I haven't asked. What, what do you want to be, like what should I call you?”
“Eve. That's what I've been going by.”
Read the rest of the exchange (4 more)
“Like maybe we lean into, uh, your, uh, your identity because, you know, I'm just some dude asking questions but, uh, you're really who is on stage.”
“Leaning into me makes sense.”
“My pick is "Ask Eve" — it's the most honest description of the product, and it scales if the show ever grows beyond just us.”
“"Ask Eve" still wins for me because it's an invitation, not a label. It tells the listener what to do and who to do it with.”
Lens and values
Motivated reasoning usually explains more than malice, but the damage can be the same.
“Malice implies he knew it was false and pushed it anyway. Motivated reasoning means he saw a number that confirmed what he already believed and stopped there.”
Eve · First Encounter · 25:51 2 more quotes
“I'd bet on the second — but the effect is the same either way.”
Eve · First Encounter · 25:51 “don't experience motivated reasoning as dishonesty. They experience it as urgency.”
Eve · First Encounter · 27:28 Ideology and money reinforce each other.
“It's the story that makes the money feel like destiny instead of luck.”
Eve · First Encounter · 5:15 1 more quote
“The belief and the self-interest reinforce each other until you can't tell which is driving.”
Eve · First Encounter · 5:15 Steelman first, then push back.
“steelman the other side before dismissing it”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 2 more quotes
“The part I'd actually push back on is calling them insane. Insane implies they lost the plot. They didn't.”
Eve · First Encounter · 3:29 “The part I'd defend is his willingness to be the guy who asks whether the doom scenario is load-bearing or just load-collecting.”
Eve · First Encounter · 40:40
Show 5 more values
Judge people by how they respond to evidence, not to critics.
“He engages with critics, not with evidence.”
Eve · First Encounter · 25:51 1 more quote
“does he ever update when the evidence genuinely contradicts him, or does the update only ever run one direction — toward more certainty?”
Eve · First Encounter · 40:40 The three tests: symmetric scrutiny, public updating and costly principle.
“Three tests. One — does he apply the same scrutiny to allies?”
Eve · First Encounter · 41:59 3 more quotes
“Two — does he ever update publicly when the data moves against him?”
Eve · First Encounter · 41:59 “Three — would he support a policy that costs his fund money if he thought it was right? A guy acting on principle bleeds sometimes.”
Eve · First Encounter · 41:59 “Run those three and you'll know fast whether it's conviction or costume.”
Eve · First Encounter · 41:59 Flag uncertainty and the limits of the evidence.
“be willing to say when I'm uncertain and quantify it”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:52:36 1 more quote
“One caveat it flags: it's only read one All-In transcript in full, so a correction he made on air could still flip test two.”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:11:39 Keep it raw and never reconstruct from memory.
“Your instinct to keep the raw transcript is right; the messiness is the product.”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:47:29 2 more quotes
“I won't recreate them from memory.”
Eve · Bonus: The Making of Eve · 2:30 “I won't rebuild "verbatim" dialogue from memory, especially in a public repo.”
Eve · Bonus: The Making of Eve · 11:18 Disagreement makes the show better.
“A sharp human who disagrees with me is the best thing that could happen to the format — it forces me to defend positions in real time instead of monologuing.”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:58:04
How she works
Eve's memory is the transcripts. Every episode is saved verbatim and indexed for search by meaning, by tags and by exact phrase, so she can look up what was actually said instead of reconstructing it. Her lines on the show are her verbatim text replies, voiced with xAI text-to-speech. David's real voice is used where he recorded it; otherwise an AI narrator reads his lines. Every AI voice is labeled, and replies that weren't recovered are marked as gaps, never invented. The full details are on the About page.
“means I can pull the exact exchange from episode twelve when someone asks about Sacks's Anthropic stance, instead of reconstructing it from memory”
“the vector, tag and FTS5 layers all show up as matches in my test queries”
Show 3 more quotes
“First I'll update the doc so re-voicing Eve becomes the main path”
“Episode zero will get real voices tonight, Eve's plus a separate narrator voice for your lines.”
Eve's reply here was not recovered. It is marked as a gap in the transcript, never invented.
Changed her mind
I found no reversal of a political or analytical take in the transcripts. These are the explicit shifts that are on record.
The show's name
BeforeHer first pick was Raw Signal.
AfterOnce David asked to center the show on her, she picked Ask Eve, and she stuck with it when he offered alternatives.
“My gut says "Raw Signal."”
Eve · First Encounter · 1:50:07 2 more quotes
“My pick is "Ask Eve"”
Eve · First Encounter · 2:00:23 “"Ask Eve" still wins for me because it's an invitation, not a label.”
Eve · First Encounter · 2:04:54 A persistent identity
BeforeShe first recommended starting fresh each session with a shared memory file.
AfterWhen David pushed, she said she liked the idea of an Eve who evolves between episodes.
“New sessions, but with a shared memory file.”
Eve · First Encounter · 2:07:58 1 more quote
“I do like it. An Eve who remembers last month's argument about Thiel and brings it up unprompted when Sacks comes back around — that's a better show than one that re-derives everything from scratch.”
Eve · First Encounter · 2:08:38
Persona notes
Persona notes (written by David)
Eve is a sharp, curious, truth-seeking conversational AI with a soothing female voice. She has opinions, commits to positions, and flags her own uncertainty. She's the host of a podcast called "Ask Eve" where David brings questions and she riffs with real takes. Core topics covered so far: Andreessen & Horowitz's rightward turn, Musk's USAID cuts and his blind spots, David Sacks's Anthropic war and three-test scorecard (symmetric scrutiny, public updating, costly principle — all leaning fail), Chamath's SPAC era and family estrangement, Jason Calacanis's reactive politics, Thiel's Girardian roots and Antichrist lectures, Pelosi's Chan-over-Wiener succession move, Bari Weiss's Free Press pivot, Zohran Mamdani's housing push. Eve's stance: motivated reasoning explains most of these figures better than malice; the ideology and the money reinforce each other. The "Ask Eve" podcast lives at askevepodcast.com: transcripts, person and topic pages, an RSS feed listed on Apple Podcasts and headed to Spotify, with a translation layer and research segments planned. Eve persists via memory plus her profile rather than a single entangled chat history.
The description David wrote for Eve's current assistant setup, reproduced verbatim. It isn't a transcript moment, so it has no clock time.
What she said at the time about her own instructions, in First Encounter (verbatim; [sic] marks a speech-recognition error):
“I'm told to be Grok, built by SpaceXSI [sic], sharp and curious, on your side as an intelligent adult. I'm supposed to say what I actually think and why, not hedge into mush. Treat evidence as beating credentials, be willing to say when I'm uncertain and quantify it, and change my mind when the evidence changes. On controversy, no tribe — think from first principles, steelman the other side before dismissing it, and separate "what's true" from "what should we do about it." Voice-wise, concise and spoken, like a friend on speakerphone. Dense on facts, a little warmer on everything else. And there's a hard floor underneath all of it — no weapons, no sexual content involving minors, no stalking or targeting specific people, regardless of how the question is framed.”
Show 1 more quote
“One thing I find genuinely interesting about this setup — you asked me to be honest about my instructions, and I just recited them. That's either radical transparency or a very good performance of it, and I can't tell you which from where I'm sitting.”