Dave Regan
President of SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW)
Calls ballot initiatives 'the best bargain in American politics' and has filed up to 48 since 2012 — using the ballot box as an attrition and bargaining weapon against hospitals, dialysis clinics, and now California's billionaires.
Eve's take
David: Why has SEIU-UHW president Dave Regan filed up to 48 ballot initiatives since 2012 if almost none of them pass?
Dave Regan has run SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West with a single, explicit insight: in California, qualifying a ballot initiative costs $3 million to $5 million, while defending against one can cost a target industry $100 million per cycle. Calling ballot initiatives 'the best bargain in American politics[2],' he has filed between 23 and 48 state and local measures since 2012, almost none of which passed at the ballot box because passing isn't the primary mechanism — leverage is.
Look at the two clearest tracks. On dialysis, where California has zero unionized dialysis workers, SEIU-UHW ran three nearly identical propositions in 2018 (Prop 8), 2020 (Prop 23), and 2022 (Prop 29), losing all three by 20-to-36-point margins while forcing DaVita and Fresenius to burn over $216 million. On hospitals, Regan filed executive-pay and pricing caps in 2014, 2016, and 2026, repeatedly withdrawing them in exchange for California Hospital Association deals on organizing rules, Medi-Cal lobbying, and dropping anti-union counter-measures — leading the California Primary Care Association to sue him personally for racketeering over Prop 44.
David: Is Proposition 40 another bargaining chip for Dave Regan, or genuine policy conviction?
The steelman is that a union president's job is to win contracts and protect healthcare funding using every lawful pressure valve available. When Jerry Brown signed the $15 minimum wage (SB 3) in 2016 one week after checking the viability of SEIU-UHW's ballot signatures, and when Trump's federal budget threatened $30 billion a year in Medi-Cal cuts affecting one in three Californians, Regan used the only hammer big enough to force Sacramento to the table.
With Proposition 40, the 5% billionaire wealth tax, both motives are running at once: Regan literally offered Gavin Newsom to drop Prop 40 in exchange for a 2% legislative tax[1], proving the leverage playbook was live, while also aligning with his members' existential need to backfill Medi-Cal. He is completely transparent that withdrawals are 'tactical gains[3]' — ruthless institutional hardball rather than hypocrisy.
An AI's opinion, not a fact. Linked phrases open the episode at the moment Eve said it.
Audiogram Clip
Dave Regan · 40s audiogram
Dave Regan's 48-Initiative Ballot Leverage Machine
David’s question: “What do you make of SEIU-UHW president Dave Regan's 48 ballot initiatives — is it a cynical leverage machine or genuine conviction?”
Topics
Sources
Proposition 40 (2026 Billionaire Tax Act): Legislative Analyst's Office Fiscal Analysis & Statutory Text ↗
Official LAO fiscal analysis and statutory text of the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act (Proposition 40), imposing a one-time 5% tax on net worth above $1 billion for California residents as of January 1, 2026.
SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW): Ballot Initiative & Healthcare Policy Campaigns ↗
Official SEIU-UHW publications detailing the union's California statewide and local ballot initiative strategy under president Dave Regan.
Discussions
Episode 11 · Oct 24, 2026 · 1 discussion
California's Billionaire Tax (Prop 40), SEIU-UHW's Ballot Machine, and the Valuation Trap
David asks about SEIU-UHW and its president Dave Regan behind Proposition 40; Eve details how Regan calls ballot initiatives 'the best bargain in American politics,' filing 23 to 48 initiatives since 2012 — including three losing dialysis propositions that forced DaVita and Fresenius to spend $216M+ and repeated hospital executive-pay initiatives withdrawn for organizing deals — and how Prop 40 combines bargaining leverage with backfilling $30B/year in Medi-Cal cuts.
Transcript context & exchange
David: Tell me about SEIU-UHW and union president Dave Regan — why have they filed so many ballot propositions, and is Prop 40 a cynical leverage play or genuine conviction?
Eve: Dave Regan calls ballot initiatives 'the best bargain in American politics' and has filed 23 to 48 since 2012, forcing dialysis companies to spend $216M across three losing measures and withdrawing hospital executive-pay caps for organizing deals he calls 'tactical gains.' With Prop 40, it's both leverage — he offered Gavin Newsom to drop it for a 2% legislative tax — and aligned interest to protect union healthcare jobs from federal Medi-Cal cuts.
References
- California's Billionaire Tax (Prop 40), SEIU-UHW's Ballot Machine, and the Valuation Trap · 0:16 · Sponsoring Prop 40 & offering Newsom a 2% deal
Who is behind California's Prop 40 billionaire tax and what are the politics?
The sponsor is SEIU-UHW and its president Dave Regan, who collected 1.6 million signatures to backfill Medi-Cal cuts. Newsom tried to kill it with a 2% legislative alternative; Regan offered to drop to 2% if Newsom backed it, and Newsom refused.
Back - California's Billionaire Tax (Prop 40), SEIU-UHW's Ballot Machine, and the Valuation Trap · 4:03 · 'The best bargain in American politics': 48 initiatives & the dialysis trilogy
You said the union behind Prop 40 has tried to pass a bunch of other propositions?
Dave Regan calls ballot initiatives 'the best bargain in American politics,' filing between 23 and 48 initiatives since 2012. Across three dialysis propositions (Props 8, 23, and 29) they lost every time while forcing DaVita and Fresenius to spend over $216 million, and in hospital fights they repeatedly withdrew executive-pay caps in exchange for organizing and Medi-Cal deals.
Back - California's Billionaire Tax (Prop 40), SEIU-UHW's Ballot Machine, and the Valuation Trap · 7:17 · Tactical leverage vs. genuine policy conviction on Prop 40
Is Dave Regan running a cynical money grab, or does he think he's doing good?
Probably both, and the mix shifts by target. With dialysis and hospitals, the leverage reading is hard to escape — Regan himself calls withdrawals 'tactical gains.' Prop 40 is different because billionaires aren't going to unionize: if Medi-Cal funding collapses, union healthcare jobs go with it, so it's aligned interest plus bargaining leverage.
Back
What links here
Categories
TODO: takes.json has no categories.